○夢んぼ本部
　〒496-8014
　住所：愛西市町方町大山田61番1
　Tel：0567-25-5913
　Fax：0567-55-8120

○第2夢んぼ
　〒496-8014
　住所：愛西市町方町大山田61番1
　Tel：0567-28-1070
　Fax：0567-28-1070

○ソーシャルセンター夢んぼ
　〒490-1304
　住所：稲沢市平和町法立十一丁31番地4
　Tel：0567-69-5586
　Fax：0567-69-5587

○ワークステーション夢んぼ
　第2ワークステーション夢んぼ
　〒496-8014
　住所：愛西市町方町松川70番地1
　Tel：0567-55-7456
　Fax：0567-55-7458

○ライフステーション夢んぼ
　〒496-8014
　住所：愛西市町方町大山田62番1
　Tel：0567-31-7811
　Fax：0567-31-9171

○ハビリテーションセンター夢んぼ
　〒496-8014
　住所：愛西市町方町大山田86番地
　Tel：0567-69-4448
　Fax：0567-69-4446

○青空ヘルパーステーション
　〒474 0035
　住所：大府市江端町二丁目８０番地２F
　Tel：0562-74-8883
　Fax：0562-74-8884

Ross, Cody T., Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Seung-Yun Oh, Samuel Bowles, Bret Beheim, John Bunce, . “Correction to: ‘Greater wealth inequality, reduced polygyny: rethinking new polygyny threshold model’.” Record of your Regal Community screen 15 (147): 20180752.

Sellen, Daniel W., and you will Daniel J. Hruschka. 2004. “Extracted-dinner money-defense polygyny inside indigenous western us Societies in the contact.” Latest anthropology 45 (5): 707–fourteen. Silas, Ellis. 1926. A primitive Arcadia. London: T. Fisher Unwin Ltd. Spencer, Herbert. 1876. Principles out of Sociology: Vol. 1. London: Appleton.

Starkweather, Katherine Age., and Raymond Hames. 2012. “A study away from Low-Ancient Polyandry.” Human instinct 23 (2): 149–72. Textor, Robert B. 1967. A mix-Cultural Bottom line. The newest Sanctuary, CT: HRAF Press.

Light, Douglas Roentgen., and you will Michael L. Burton. 1988. “Factors behind Polygyny: Ecology, Benefit, Kinship, and you will Warfare.” American anthropologist ninety (4): 871–87.

Whiting, John W. Yards. 1964. “Outcomes of weather for the specific social practices.” Inside the Explorations in the Cultural Anthropology: Essays in honor of George Peter Murdock, modified because of the Ward Appear Goodenough, 511–44. New york, NY: McGraw-Mountain.

Whiting, John W. M., and you may Beatrice B. Whiting. 1975. “Aloofness and you can Intimacy of Husbands and you will Wives: A combination-Cultural Study.” Ethos step three (2): 183–207.

1. Brand new figures come from new Ethnographic Atlas Murdock (1962–1971) because the recovered out-of during the D-Place.org (Kirby mais aussi al. 2016) ??
2. This type of data depend on research from the Basic Cross Social Test which were coded by Broude and you will Greene (1985) ; such study with the wedding have been retrieved out of D-Place varying SCCS739. Of your own 148 communities in the Fundamental Cross Social Attempt and therefore Broude and you may Green coded 30.1% have full private options, 17.6% have personal options that needs parental recognition, step 3.4% possess private alternatives that can need parental plan, 18.2% features both individual options otherwise put up marriage, 16.9% keeps set up relationship, but people have the capability to object, and you may a dozen.8% possess totally created marriage.??
3. The brand new rates inside section plus in new Contour try oriented toward investigation on the Basic Cross-Social Decide to try (Murdock and you can Light 1969) ; these types of data to the polygyny have been retrieved off D-Put varying SCCS211. The standard Get across-Cultural Test (SCCS) was a sample off 185 societies. Numbers in the SCCS including advised brand new incorporated pie chart lower than.??
4. There are only dos polyandrous communities on the SCCS.??
5. Of the numerous types of polygyny, minimal was most common, followed by nonsororal polygyny, following sororal polygyny.??
6. A cross-kinds examination of mammals and birds M. Ember and you may Ember (1979) discovered that an excessive amount of people and additionally predict polygynous in place of monogamous bonding. Specific research has perhaps not discovered help with the sex ratio concept, but procedures regarding polygyny was basically different (Hooper 2006; Quinlan and Quinlan 2007) or varying are imputed (Minocher, Duda, and you will Jaeggi 2019) .??

On the Person Interactions Urban area Data files

Peoples Connections Urban area Data files, Inc. ( HRAF ) are an internationally recognized organization in the field of cultural anthropology. Their purpose is to try to remind and you will facilitate the new cross-cultural study of people society, neighborhood and you may conclusion in the past and present.

EHRAF Database

1. eHRAF Community Countries
2. eHRAF Archaeology

Contact HRAF

1. Tel: 203-764-9401

Common answer to test ideas is to try to contrast communities which have and you may as opposed to a traditional feature to see if the fresh type try forecast because of the type when you look at the an assumed causal basis. While you are such as evaluating cannot be held rather than variation to learn, choices in other animal species may shed light on these types of concepts. Obviously, we can not talk about relationship various other varieties, but we could see varieties with stability into the men-feminine mating and you will compare all of them with varieties not having people balances.

In other societies, personal detection out of relationships is founded on a successful demonstration period. The Guarani from South usa practice trial wedding, where official wedding processes try deferred until after the prospective groom demonstrates his viability to have matrimony sugardaddymeet. Schaden and you may Lewinsohn (1962) informs us you to

Area exogamy/endogamy

Of several anthropological profile report jealousy one of co-spouses. ) discover that within ninety% of communities with co-wives, ethnographers declaration sexual and you may psychological dispute plus they finish that argument is much more-or-reduced a beneficial common for the polygynous societies. Polygynous communities appear to have responded to jealousy which have specific common lifestyle and you will rules that come with: having separate household and kitchen areas for nonsororal co-wives, with legislation throughout the husbands sharing tips equitably, and having regulations to own sleeping having co-spouses when you look at the rotation (C. Roentgen. Ember, Ember, and you will Peregrine 2019, 245) . Offered significant jealousy, some anthropologists find it puzzling that polygyny is really commonplace (age.g., Meters. Ember (1974) ).

Are there architectural points that can help us make up different split up rates? Though some lookup helps the theory you to definitely societies with matrilocal quarters become more tolerant of divorce proceedings (Minturn, Grosse, and you may Haider 1969) , almost every other lookup doesn’t get the dating including good whenever most other products are managed (Ackerman 1963; Pearson and you may Hendrix 1979) . Ackerman (1963) shows that the levels to which a wife is actually contained in an effective society’s descent framework is much more predictive. Instance incorporation are going to be just before elizabeth people, otherwise it does are present once relationship, such being cared for of the an effective ily. Ackerman (1963) finds you to definitely

Goody, Jack. 1973. “Bridewealth and you may Dowry in the Africa and you may Eurasia.” In Bridewealth and Dowry, edited from the Jack Goody and S. J. Tambiah, 1–58. Cambridge Records inside Social Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge College Force.

• Tweet

前の記事へ

次の記事へ